I'm not off the Alex Smith bandwagon - yet. I do think he's regressed a bit this year, but I didn't hear anybody calling for a change when he was carving up the Bills two weeks ago or when the team stormed off to a 2-0 start with victories over the Packers and Lions.
Yes, he looked like garbage during the Giants loss and during several drives last night. But shuffling in Colin Kaepernick during critical moments near the red zone isn't helping matters, either.
Last week, Damon Bruce (KNBR) made a point on his show about the loss to New York that made a lot of sense. On the first drive of the game, Smith led the team down the field. The Niners faced a 3rd-and-7 just outside the Giants' 20 and the Kaepernick came into the game. Now, if I'm Smith, I'm thinking "I just drove you guys 60 yards against a pretty good defense, it's time to convert to keep the drive going, and you take me out? This is MY job! WTF?" Meanwhile, Kaepernick is ineffective, the team lines up for a field goal attempt on 4th down and Akers misses the kick. Boom goes the dynamite.
Throughout the game, the Niners brought Kaepernick in with mixed (mostly bad) results. At best, the 49ers pick up a few yards and keep the opposing defense guessing. At worst, it completely disrupts the quarterback's rhythm and often throws him back on the field in a do-or-die situation.
Last night, Kaepernick was brought in to run a second-down play in the red zone and a minimal gain set up a 3rd-and-7 situation. When Smith returned to the game, he had one chance to convert and he forced a ball into coverage that resulted in an endzone pick. It was a terrible throw, but also a terrible decision to put your quarterback in that situation.
On two other occasions, the Niners basically gave up on third down and ran designed running plays for Smith, including one on their last drive that could have wrapped up the game. It makes no sense. If he's your quarterback, make him act like a quarterback and MAKE A PLAY. Oddly enough, those two plays would have been more suited for Kaepernick's running abilities (although they would have been telegraphed if he entered the game at either of those two points).
There's a reason no team has sustained success with Wildcat formations: they are a gimmick. And once opposing defenses have seen enough of it on film, they can prepare for it and it becomes ineffective. That's why the Broncos were so eager to get rid of Tim Tebow despite a playoff victory over the Steelers last year, and why the pathetic Jets haven't even bothered using him in similar fashion this year.
One more thing - Smith gets absolutely blasted for every interception he throws. The guy has no margin for error with the fans and media these days, and I think he's deserved a bit of slack after last year's performance. If mistake-prone (and turnover machine) golden boy Tony Romo gets a free pass to remain the unquestioned quarterback in mediocre Dallas, Smith deserves to have a chance to let this season play out without getting burned at the stake.
Is Smith the long-term answer for the 49ers? Probably not. But until Colin Kaepernick is accomplished enough to run an entire offensive playbook, he's the best we have.
Friday, October 19, 2012
A Win is a Win, But...
That was ugly last night. I'm glad the 49ers took care of business against the Seahawks, but that game was a perfect illustration of why I'm not lining up to purchase season tickets at the new stadium.
First of all, Thursday night games, in theory, are great. You get a bonus NFL game before the weekend. It's something to look forward to and it helps break up the workweek.
But generally, these games are pretty bad as both teams are preparing on a short week. And if it's your team that's playing, it's a no-win situation. Either you take the day off and trudge up to the stadium on a weeknight (home games), or you pray your team doesn't sleepwalk through the game after adding a travel day to the short week mix (away games). Pick your poison.
Secondly, it was a divisional game. That would seem like a good thing, right? Not when your team is playing in the bastardized NFC West.
No matter how hard the league tries to stuff it down our throats, the Seahawks belong in the AFC, the Cardinals in the NFC East and the Rams in Los Angeles. There are no historical rivalries within the division anymore. I wouldn't pay a dime to see the 49ers battle the "rival" Seahawks for NFC West supremacy after sitting through 30 seasons of San Francisco-Seattle snorefests during the exhibition season.
The Cardinals? Please. One recent Super Bowl appearance with Kurt Warner is the only thing keeping them from complete irrelevance over the past 50 years. And Warner's first team, the Rams, play in a nondescript dome in a nondescript midwestern city (yes, I'm still smarting from last night's demoralizing St. Louis Cardinals beatdown of the Giants in the NLCS) that has negated what was once a passionate "NoCal vs. SoCal" geographic rivalry.
That's your NFC West: the 49ers, one dull team, another duller team and one more dull team.
So there's three games you can toss off the schedule every season. Throw in two preseason exhibitions, and you're already looking at five games (half the home schedule) that I wouldn't waste an entire Sunday for, let alone PAY for.
But hey - the Niners won last night, stay atop the NFC West, and I get to enjoy an NFL Sunday without stressing about my team. You take what you can get.
First of all, Thursday night games, in theory, are great. You get a bonus NFL game before the weekend. It's something to look forward to and it helps break up the workweek.
But generally, these games are pretty bad as both teams are preparing on a short week. And if it's your team that's playing, it's a no-win situation. Either you take the day off and trudge up to the stadium on a weeknight (home games), or you pray your team doesn't sleepwalk through the game after adding a travel day to the short week mix (away games). Pick your poison.
Secondly, it was a divisional game. That would seem like a good thing, right? Not when your team is playing in the bastardized NFC West.
No matter how hard the league tries to stuff it down our throats, the Seahawks belong in the AFC, the Cardinals in the NFC East and the Rams in Los Angeles. There are no historical rivalries within the division anymore. I wouldn't pay a dime to see the 49ers battle the "rival" Seahawks for NFC West supremacy after sitting through 30 seasons of San Francisco-Seattle snorefests during the exhibition season.
The Cardinals? Please. One recent Super Bowl appearance with Kurt Warner is the only thing keeping them from complete irrelevance over the past 50 years. And Warner's first team, the Rams, play in a nondescript dome in a nondescript midwestern city (yes, I'm still smarting from last night's demoralizing St. Louis Cardinals beatdown of the Giants in the NLCS) that has negated what was once a passionate "NoCal vs. SoCal" geographic rivalry.
That's your NFC West: the 49ers, one dull team, another duller team and one more dull team.
So there's three games you can toss off the schedule every season. Throw in two preseason exhibitions, and you're already looking at five games (half the home schedule) that I wouldn't waste an entire Sunday for, let alone PAY for.
But hey - the Niners won last night, stay atop the NFC West, and I get to enjoy an NFL Sunday without stressing about my team. You take what you can get.
Friday, October 5, 2012
No, We Don't
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


